Re: PlPython
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PlPython |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1056648207.753.29.camel@haggis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PlPython (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PlPython
Re: PlPython |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:59, Tom Lane wrote: > DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com> writes: > > Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it > > need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected. > > Now that the rexec code is gone, it MUST be marked untrusted --- this is > not a question for debate. Installing it as trusted would be a security > hole. In what version is rexec removed? v2.3? If so, then there are many people with Python 2.2 and even 2.1 who could still use trusted PlPython. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net | | Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson | | | | "Oh, great altar of passive entertainment, bestow upon me | | thy discordant images at such speed as to render linear | | thought impossible" (Calvin, regarding TV) | +-----------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: