Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1056119151.7086.2263.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 04:41, Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait > > > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the > > > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release). > > > > > > Just a thought. > > > > And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle > > prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh > > oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected > > happens :( > > > >... > > I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of > a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original > delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to > be another extension? > There really isn't for this release. Any talk of delay is just a thought on general policy for future releases. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: