Re: WHERE of an AGGREGATE ...
| От | deststar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WHERE of an AGGREGATE ... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1055635083.2816.6.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | WHERE of an AGGREGATE ... (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WHERE of an AGGREGATE ...
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Isn't that what the having clause is about?
- Stuart
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 00:31, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> I have a query that looks like:
>
> SELECT SUM(bytes) AS traffic
> FROM traffic_table
> GROUP BY ip;
>
> I want to narrow that SELECT down to a subset, like:
>
> SELECT SUM(bytes) AS traffic
> FROM traffic_table
> WHERE traffic < ( 100 * 1024 * 1024 )
> GROUP BY ip;
>
> which, of course, won't work, cause I need to do the GROUP BY before I do
> the WHERE ... but there has to be a way of coding that so that it does
> work :(
>
> I'm overlooking something obvious here ... I think?
>
> Thanks ...
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: