Robert...you are probably under the impression that I some sort of
expert in DB2 -- that would be incorrect !! Over the years. I have
scratched my way to gain some understanding of it. That's it.
When it comes to "BEGIN ATOMIC" references within TRIGGER statements...I
have NO idea. Where/Why the reference to "ATOMIC" I can not guess.
Sounds impressive though.
/Alan
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:32, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 01:25, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the "BEGIN ATOMIC" is superfluous in PostgreSQL; triggers are atomic by
> > definition.
> >
>
> Hey Alan, is there any other type of "BEGIN's" that are allowed in DB2
> functions?
>
> Robert Treat