Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 14:16, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Rod,
>
> > > 4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?
> >
> > Since we're painting a shed, does it make sense to put the items in
> > alphabetical order for each section?
>
> I thought about that, yes.   However, I find that most items have a logical
> order that is not alphabetical.   Take the WAL section for example:

Excellent point.

> BTW, everyone:  I do not seem to be receiving any Postgresql.org mail since
> the server crash & restoration.  So please cc: any comments directly to me!

You re-subscribed I assume...

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc