> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-05/msg00103.php
>
> > Please apply the above.
>
> I was unconvinced that the proposed patch actually implements SQL99
> semantics, as opposed to grafting SQL99-like syntax onto Postgres
> semantics.
Yes, but the second attempt (linked above) addressed those concerns did
it not? There wasn't a response one way or the other, and a lack of a
negative response is generally a good thing on -patches.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc