On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 09:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
> > Are you ok with the DB2 and draft-spec syntax of NEXT VALUE FOR (where
> > value is not a reserved word)? Or should I hold onto that until the
> > spec has gone through the final draft / release?
>
> By that time we'll have done the Oracle-style foo.nextval, and it'll
> become kind of a moot point ;-)
Well, not moot for anyone trying to go between PostgreSQL and a
non-Oracle (or SapDB) database, but certainly of less concern.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc