Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
>> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
>> of the sanity check.  I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
>> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.

> Any status on this?

Shipped in last week's updates.
        regards, tom lane