Re: do we need to postpone beta4?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
Дата
Msg-id 10522.1280254262@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на do we need to postpone beta4?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: do we need to postpone beta4?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: do we need to postpone beta4?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: do we need to postpone beta4?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think we should consider postponing beta4.  I count eleven
> non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there
> are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of
> which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on
> pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to
> be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update().  It seems
> unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and
> still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap.  Does it
> make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring
> another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit?

If we don't wrap a beta this week, the next possible window is several
weeks away, because various people will be on vacation.  So I think we
should get the existing fixes out there, even if there are known bugs
remaining.  A beta is not an RC.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: do we need to postpone beta4?
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby