Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1051292167.7747.700.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Scott Lamb <slamb@slamb.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 12:54, Scott Lamb wrote: > > On Friday, Apr 25, 2003, at 10:16 US/Central, Robert Treat wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 08:51, justin@postgresql.org wrote: > >> There was a private mailing list that the people who volunteered > >> subscribed to. > > > > I'd just like to put forth the opinion that the private list/discussion > > is the reason why it never got off the ground. > > I have to agree with this. I just don't understand why the websites are > developed so differently from source code. In fact, I just don't really > understand how people get involved in improving the website when > there's not even a public mailing list. I've complained about problems > with the website before and offered to help fix them, in whatever other > mailing list it's spilled over to. I don't have the time to > consistently pump stuff out...but that's never a problem in source > projects. I can contribute a patch, wander off, contribute another, and > my contributions are still welcome. I'd really like to see all the > websites in the same place, with a publically accessible repository, > with commit emails, with public mailing lists. Developed like a source > code project. Can Bricolage (or whatever CMS system you're leaning > toward now) do that? > This is not a technical problem, it is a management problem. Robert Treat
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: