Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1050438063.391.25.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 15:32, Josh Berkus wrote: > And the majority of *database application developers* have no exposure to CVS, > Emacs, Latex, or similar "Unix geek" utilities. What about SGML/DocBook? The Linux Documentation Project has tons of user-contributed documentation written by individuals of varying levels of technical skill, and they seem to be doing fine with DocBook, and without a fancy CMS system. > (BTW, I, like Justin, know how to use CVS but find it arcane and annoying. > Also CVS isn't the only version control system in the world, nor the easiest > to use. May I point out that Linus has stopped using CVS for the kernel?) <OT> Linus never used CVS for the kernel. But since his requirements for a version control system are far in excess of whatever techdocs would need, I don't really see how it's relevant. </OT> I understand the need to settle on the right technology, but before we get ahead of ourselves, perhaps we can just pick something and be done with it? Just my 2 cents... Cheers, Neil
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: