Re: show all;
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: show all; |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10486.991440486@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: show all; (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>) |
| Ответы |
Re: show all;
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee> writes:
> As I understand Tom, all vars should go through GUC and some of
> the current .conf vars will be SET-able. So RESET ALL would
> be quite weird.
RESET ALL should re-establish the same state of the conf vars that you'd
get with a freshly started backend. This doesn't seem weird or even in
need of discussion ...
> 1) rolls TX back, so you are not in any TX
This I do not agree with; it ties together two concepts that are better
kept separate. (If SET were under transaction control, my opinion might
be different ... but it isn't.) There is nothing wrong with sending a
ROLLBACK if you want to be sure you are not in a transaction block.
Further, there could be situations where you want to RESET the conf vars
without forcing a rollback.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: