Re: gborg - who maintains it?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gborg - who maintains it? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1047937939.23128.1346.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gborg - who maintains it? ("Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:54, Neil Conway wrote: > Robert Treat said: > > While where somewhat on the topic, has anyone looked at using gforge > > (http://gforge.org/) for project hosting? > > Or, just switch to SF itself (or Savannah, if you're paranoid). I have yet > to see anyone make a convincing argument for duplicating all of that > project management infrastructure. > I don't know what the original reasoning was, but I think the arguments /now/ would be that: * sourceforge no longer uses postgresql as their dbms, so we should try to avoid using their services and use a service that will reflect better on the postgresql community. * savannah's current ties to GNU might make it difficult for us to work smoothly within their framework (since postgresql is bsd licensed to start with). I'm not going to argue that those are convincing arguments (though they are for some) but I do think it is nice to have a central repository for postgresql related projects, especially one that the community has some control over. If I had to pick between the two, I'd pick gforge :-) Robert Treat
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: