Re: Sorting by NULL values

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 15:13, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Ian Burrell wrote:
>
> > I am doing a query where I need to sort by a column that may be NULL
> > because it is coming from an OUTER JOIN.  I noticed a difference between
> > PostgreSQL and other databases about where NULLs show up.  It seems that
> > with Postgres, NULLs are sorted after other values.  Other databases
> > sort them before.
>
> > Is there any standard on how sorting NULLs work?  Is there a way to

If you care, order by their boolean equivelent first:

order by field is null desc, field

DESC puts nulls first, since true > false

> IIRC, they're either considered greater than or less than non-NULL values,
> but the decision is up to the implementation.
>
> > change Postgres's behavior?  Is there a way to replace the NULLs with
> > empty strings?
>
> Coalesce should work.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc