Re: repository size differences

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: repository size differences
Дата
Msg-id 10466.1285107022@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: repository size differences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Magnus did
>> � � � �git gc --aggressive --prune
>> during the conversion. �I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it.

> It's also possible that some of the history cleanup we did might have
> helped, although that's pure speculation on my part.

The converted repositories I was getting during testing (without any use
of git gc) were circa 300MB.  So it wasn't the CVS-side cleanups that
did it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?