Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1044387405.6534.963.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:21, Tom Lane wrote: > After some further research, pcre does seem like an interesting > alternative. Both pcre and Spencer's new code have essentially > Berkeley-style licenses, so there's no problem there. Keep in mind that pcre has an advertising clause in its license (software that distributes pcre commercially or non-commercially needs to add a note to the effect in its documentation / online help). Since PostgreSQL's license doesn't have this restriction, it would be shame to impose that requirement on PostgreSQL users. (Note that as I'm not a lawyer, my interpretation of the license may not be correct.) > Strict Perl compatibility would be a nice feature, but right at the > moment the multibyte issue is looking like the determining factor. Agreed -- ISTM that Spencer's new engine is probably the best choice. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: