Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Дата
Msg-id 1044013378.7957.2.camel@huli
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason the TIP is
> still there is that there are platforms on which that stuff doesn't work
> very nicely.  It's better to let the postmaster exit cleanly so that
> that state gets cleaned up.  I have no idea what the comparable issues
> are for a native Windows port, but I bet there are some...

That's why I proposed an automated test for this too. It is mostly
important when conquering new OS'es, but could also be nice to have when
testing if changes to storage manager or some other important subsystem
will break anything.

>             regards, tom lane
-- 
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Следующее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report