Re: Recursive unions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: Recursive unions
Дата
Msg-id 1043875633.1611.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recursive unions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Recursive unions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane kirjutas K, 29.01.2003 kell 17:58:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What was the result of the recursive unions thread?  I remember Tom maybe
> > saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however
> > was it said that that was going to be done by Redhat for 7.4?
> 
> It'll be looked at; whether it will be done in time for 7.4 is anyone's guess.

Is anyone actually working on it ?

I had some work on it done in this direction for 7.2.x (yacc patches up
to parse tree generation).

If nobody is currently doing it, I would start pushing it by bringing my
work to 7.4 and then doing small amounts of work and then bugging the
list about what would be the best ways to continue, repeating it until
it is done ;)

-- 
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dann Corbit"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recursive unions