Re: Win32 port patches submitted
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1043573724.2074.1.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 port patches submitted (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 port patches submitted
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian kirjutas P, 26.01.2003 kell 05:07: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > I don't see a strong reason not > > > to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already > > > requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full > > > shell environment. > > > > Indeed. I think the goal here is to have a port that *runs* in native > > Windows; but I see no reason not to require Cygwin for *building* it. > > Agreed. I don't mind Cygwin if we don't have licensing problems with > distributing a Win32 binary that used Cygwin to build. I do have a > problem with MKS toolkit, which is a commerical purchase. I would like > to avoid reliance on that, though Jan said he needed their bash. IIRC mingw tools had win-native (cygwin-less) bash at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ -- Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: