Re: Row security violation error is misleading

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Row security violation error is misleading
Дата
Msg-id 1043278572.1890469.1428502061756.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Row security violation error is misleading  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Row security violation error is misleading  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Re-using the SQLSTATE 44000 is a bit iffy too. We should
>> probably define something to differentiate this, like:
>>
>>    44P01 ROW SECURITY WRITE POLICY VIOLATION
>
> Yes, that sounds sensible.

I would be more inclined to use:

42501  ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE

I know this is used 173 other places where a user attempts to do
something they are not authorized to do, so you would not be able
to differentiate the specific cause based on SQLSTATE if this is
used -- but why don't we feel that way about the other 173 causes?
Why does this security violation require a separate SQLSTATE?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tuple visibility within a single XID
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sloppy SSPI error reporting code