Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1042473637.19712.8.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 10:47, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com] > > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > Total Hits 1339547 > > > Total Files 1064536 > > > Total Pages 324346 > > > Total Visits 58178 > > > Total KBytes 2712883 > > > > > > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days. > > > > > > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-) > > > > It's irrelevant. The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored > > and the question was about mirrors. > > It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads > and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a > small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits > of the sites might get. > Perhaps this means we need to put more focus in finding ways to get other parts of the site mirrored. Robert Treat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: