On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can see some value in the SET WITHOUT OIDS half of the patch, as this
> gives a way of reclaiming space in a table that was unthinkingly created
> with OIDs. But I'm not sure we should expend the code space to provide
> just a one-way transformation.
IMHO, it's still worth having this part of the patch, even if the
transformation is only one-way.
Cheers,
Neil