Re: Unions and where optimisation
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unions and where optimisation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1042041735.3237.1.camel@huli обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Unions and where optimisation (Boris Klug <boris.klug@control.de>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:25, Boris Klug wrote: > Hello! > > I am quite new in the PostgreSQL performance business, done a few years Oracle > stuff before. My ist question is the following: > > We have three table, lets name them rk150, 151 and rk152. They all have a > timestamp and a order number in common but than different data after this. > Now I need the data from all tables in one view for a given order number, so > I created a view > > create view orderevents as > select ts, aufnr from rk150 > union > select ts, aufnr from rk151 > union > select ts, aufnr from rk152; try making the orderevents view like this: create view orderevents as select rk.aufnr, sub.ts from rk150 rk, ( select ts from rk150 where aufnr = rk.aufr union select ts from rk151 where aufnr = rk.aufr union select ts from rk152 where aufnr = rk.aufr ) as sub ; this could/should force your desired behavior. > My question now: Is the optimizer able to move the where clause into unions? > If so, how I can get him to do it? > > Thank you for the help in advance! -- Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: