"Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
> Hrm, I thought if anything we wanted to put them in pg_constraints (at
> least inherited ones). Now maybe I have defaults confused with NOT
> NULLs... But don't we want to be able to give defaults names and and
> such?
No, I think you're thinking of NOT NULL. There's no reason to have
names for defaults that I can see.
regards, tom lane