Re: Update on replication
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update on replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1040180142.1863.8.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update on replication (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update on replication
Re: Update on replication SourceForge policy on http://sourceforge.net/tos/tos.php |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 21:33, Greg Copeland wrote: > I do agree, GBorg needs MUCH higher visibility! I'm just curious: why do we need GBorg at all? Does it offer anything that SourceForge, or a similar service does not offer? Especially given that (a) most other OSS projects don't have a site for "related projects" (unless you count something like CPAN, which is totally different) (b) GBorg is completely unknown to anyone outside the PostgreSQL community and even to many people within it... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: