nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) writes:
>> If we're going to change the structure anyway, let's fix it to be
>> independent of NAMEDATALEN.
> Sounds good. If we're making other backwards-incompatible changes to
> pgNotify, one thing that bugs me about the API is the use of "relname"
> to refer to name of the NOTIFY/LISTEN condition.
I hear you ... but my proposal only requires a recompile, *not* any
source code changes. Renaming the field would break client source code.
I doubt it's worth that.
regards, tom lane