Re: Why does everyone think MySQL is easier?
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why does everyone think MySQL is easier? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1038507546.378.28.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why does everyone think MySQL is easier? ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 10:10, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 28 Nov 2002 at 15:35, Mats Lofkvist wrote: > > The need for vacuum makes Postgres work less well straight > > out of the box, if you don't know about it your performance > > will slowly go down the drain. (I don't remember how the > > vacuum improvements in 7.3 change this, will a 7.3 > > installation work reasonably well without vacuum being run > > at all e.g. in a scenario with lots of updates? (**)) > > In other words, 7.3 has good performance as it is. So if you vacuum, you will > see a really blazing performance.. Or more accurately, in 7.3 the performance of indexscans should degrade less if there are a lot of expired tuples in the table (thanks to Tom Lane's work). It won't effect seqscans, though. Cheers, Neil
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: