Re: Sort time
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sort time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1037386103.14810.82.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sort time ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sort time
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 12:33, Josh Berkus wrote: > Pginfo, > > > Yes I have indexes on all this fields. > > Also I vacuumed and that is the result after it. > > Actualy I do not see what bad in query execution. The problem is in > > sort > > time! > > Hmmm... I don't understand. The way I read the EXPLAIN, the sort is > only taking a few seconds. Am I missing something, here? The estimated cost had the sort at a few seconds, but the actual times show it is taking 50% of the total query time. The big problem is he's sorting by a varchar() which isn't overly quick no matter what locale. Integers are nice and quick (s.OP is an int, which shows this). If IDS_NUM is a number, he could try casting it to an int8, but without data examples I couldn't say. -- Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: