Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10373.973837270@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects
inherited from template1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> I have also mentioned this on two occasions now, and each has met with
> total silence. I have come to interpret this to mean either (a) the idea is
> too stupid to rate a comment, or (b) go ahead with the proposal.
More like "oof ..."
You're right, it's *a* solution, but it'd involve a lot of tedious work.
It's not just adding a column to all the system tables. If I interpret
correctly what Mark and Gene are concerned about, it'd also mean
changing the code so that any update to a system-table row would
automatically clear the "I'm a standard item" flag. That's not just
tedious, it's also the sort of thing that will break because someone
forgets to do it someplace.
I think everyone is keeping quiet until they can think of a better
idea...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: