The query is working fine under pg explorer.
Yann
Surlignage Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>:
> It doesn't even get to postgres at that point. So it must be something
> else. Is the query correct?
>
> Dave
> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 11:23, ygloriau@siliage.fr wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using this driver: pgjdbc2.jar
> > And i'm sure that the problem is from the number of parameter. I tryed to
>
> > insert other parameters before before the 51th, and it didn't worked.
> > I also had a look at the source code. I've seen that it wasn't limited.
> > So, if it's not the driver, may it be postgres ?
> > Yann
> >
> >
> > Surlignage Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>:
> >
> > > Yann
> > >
> > > Which version of the driver are you using.
> > >
> > > Looking at the latest code, the statement is parsed and the number of
> > > parameters are set based on the number of ? marks in the statement. Are
> > > you sure it is the number of parameters or actually the 51 st parameter
> > > that is causing the problem.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 10:35, ygloriau@siliage.fr wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > I'm dealing with the hugest query i've ever seen : 93 parameters !
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that i got an exception when i try to add the 51th
> > > parameter.
> > > > No way to have mor ethan 50 parameters.
> > > > Is there a solution to fix up this problem ?
> > > > (I won't rewrite the query !)
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Yann
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>