Re: Hot Backup
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1035470520.12582.7.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Backup (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Backup
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I think you missed the part of the thread where the nuclear bomb hit the data center. hmm... maybe it wasn't a nuclear bomb, but it was getting there. :-) BTW - I believe we'll have real PITR in 7.4, about 6 months away. Robert Treat On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 10:34, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:40:44AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > > Is it me or do doomsdays scenarios sometimes seem a little silly? I'd > > Not if your contract requires five-nines reliablility and no more > than 180 minutes of downtime _ever_. Is five-nines realistic? For > most purposes, probably not, according to recent pronouncements (see, > e.g. <http://www.bcr.com/bcrmag/2002/05/p22.asp>). But it's in > lots of contracts anyway. > > > like to ask just where are you storing your "incremental backups" with > > Oracle/m$ sql ?? If it's on the same drive, then when you drive craps > > The more or less standard way of doing this is to stream the > PITR-required stuff to another device on another controller -- lots > of people stream to tape. People have been doing this for ages, > partly because disks used to be (a) expensive and (b) unreliable. >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: