Re: transactions
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1034789151.31803.60.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: transactions (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 12:47, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:38AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote: > > > > > Which reminds me, when Oracle was responding to the .org using postgresql > > > issue they said that Postgresql doesn't support transactions. Did they > > > even bother looking at the docs for Postgresql before spewing their lame > > > crap??? Probably not. > > > > To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL > > lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise > > database". While that is presumably something beyond just > > "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed > > actually to be. Anyone got any ideas? > > They were confusing us with MySQL. It was a marketing guy. > s/guy/ploy Robert Treat
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: