Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
От | Brett Schwarz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1031159281.2322.9339.camel@thor обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas ("Iavor Raytchev" <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
But in relational theory, doesn't relations refer to what we commonly refer to as tables? I think this would be confusing as well. However, I do agree that it would be cool to have it automatically generated... On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 10:00, Iavor Raytchev wrote: > Ross and Iavor: > > > > > BTW, has the 'schema' tab been renamed yet? With actual > > > > schema > > > > in 7.3, that'll get confusing. > > > > > Not renamed yet. > > > > In which case, we need to come up with a different name. How > > does > > "diagrams" strike you all? > > Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind of > correct. Basically now we just display them, so 'Diagrams' could be > correct for us for now. In MS Access the relations are actually built > there. That's what I would like us to do - use the current 'Schema' tab > (they are not tabs anymore in the new interface) and make it able to > build relations (represented in the code with referential integrity). > Then 'Diagrams' would not fit, but 'Relations'. Also 'References'. > > Iavor -- Brett Schwarz brett_schwarz AT yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: