Re: Open 7.3 items
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1030479059.51638.11.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open 7.3 items (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Open 7.3 items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It should also be noted that it's easy to get the DBAs to change their username in the future when / if the @ hack goes away BUT it will be difficult to change the usernames of the hundreds to thousands of customer accounts. For an upgrade, we'd end up making a script in the upgrade to keep them the same (with the @) then have a control panel code in place to suggest to the user that they may stop using the @ if they wish <click here> type of thing. > > > > Tom likes this because it is the fewer global users who have to append > > > > the '@'. > > > > At least that was my perception of the uneasy consensus reached. > > > OK, you have now split the vote because we have two for the change, and > > two against. Why do you prefer to tag the globals? Is it Tom's > > argument? I think it is kind of strange to tag the globals when it is > > the locals who have @ in their username, and when they do: > In the case of a virtual hosting postmaster, global users would likely be > DBA's, although they might not be. These users are going to be the > exception, not the rule -- thus a character to tag their 'exceptional' > nature.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: