Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
| От | Greg Copeland |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1029262211.13287.1.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS (strange@nsk.yi.org) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:45, strange@nsk.yi.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:04:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > On a system where building with large-file support is reasonably > > standard, I agree that PG should be built that way too. Where it's > > not so standard, I agree with Andrew Sullivan's concerns ... > > What do you mean by "standard"? That only some filesystems are supported? > In Linux the vfat filesystem doesn't support largefiles, so the behaviour > is the same as if the application didn't specify O_LARGEFILE to open(2): > As Helge Bahmann pointed out, "kernel will refuse to write files larger than > 2GB". In current Linux, a signal (SIGXFSZ) is sent to the application > that then dumps core. > > > So, the use of O_LARGEFILE is nullified by the lack of support by the > filesystem, but no problem is introduced by the application supporting > largefiles, it already existed before. > Thank you. That's a point that I previously pointed out...you just did a much better job of it. Specifically, want to stress that enabling large file support is not dangerous. Greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера