Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Copeland
Тема Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Дата
Msg-id 1028660961.8190.856.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Список pgsql-hackers
When I've seen this done, I've seen DLT's used as they allow for
multiple channels to be streamed to tape at the same time.  If your tape
device does not allow for multiple, concurrent input streams, you're
going to have to obtain multiple drives.

Please keep in mind, my DLT experience is limited.

Greg


On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 13:35, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:52:27PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > But what if you normally continuous LOG to tape, and now you want to
> > backup to tape.  You can't use the same tape drive for both operations.
> > Is that typical?  I know sites that had only one tape drive that did
> > that.
>
> I have seen such installations.  They always seemed like a real false
> economy to me.  Tape drives are not so expensive that, if you really
> need to ensure your data is well and truly safe, you can't afford two
> of them.  But that's just my 2 cents.  (Or, I guess in this case, 4
> cents.)
>
> A
>
> --
> ----
> Andrew Sullivan                               87 Mowat Avenue
> Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M6K 3E3
>                                          +1 416 646 3304 x110
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Join syntax and join order