Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations

On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 16:59, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:

> You don't need it.
> As long as whole block is saved in log on first after
> checkpoint (you made before backup) change to block.

I thought half the point of PITR was to be able to turn off pre-image
logging so you can trade potential recovery time for speed without fear
of data-loss. Didn't we have this discussion before?

How is this any worse than a table scan?
-- 
J. R. Nield
jrnield@usol.com