Re: lock listing
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lock listing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1028142958.1790.51.camel@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lock listing (nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)) |
Ответы |
Re: lock listing
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 14:47, Neil Conway wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:34:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions > > that return tuple sets and use those. That may be a cleaner solution. > > Why is that cleaner? Cleaner may be the wrong word. Consistent, follows tradition, more obvious to those who have used PostgreSQL for a number of years... Slightly lower learning curve for newbies. Sub-selects in the from based on functions is not that common. Selecting from tables is :) Lastly, it'll show up in \dS if it's a sudo table. The function is buried in thousands of \df results.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: