Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10278.1438785168@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Wasn't the point that 32 bit AIX as a whole hasn't been supported for a
> couple years now? My willingness to expend effort for that is rather
> limited.
Well, there's one in the buildfarm. We don't generally turn off
buildfarm critters just because the underlying OS is out of support
(the population would be quite a bit lower if we did).
> I mean I'd otherwise ok with a PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE flag that takes
> effect in c.h or so. That could easily be set in src/template/aix. Might
> also be useful for investigatory purposes every couple years or so.
+1, that could have other use-cases.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: