Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10261.1269387333@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What about InnoDB?
> Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use. There are plenty
> of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like
> full text search. I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is
> overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely
> db tables is a better fit.
That's apparently also the position of their lead developer; although
considering he's not actually done anything about it for six or more
years, it seems like quite a lame excuse for blocking ports to other
DBs.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: