Re: Document How Commit Handles Aborted Transactions

Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 at 18:31, David G. Johnston
> <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Listing commands described as being “present for historical reasons” in the documentation seems unnecessary.  We
don’tlist abort in the “See Also” section either. 

> I bumped into specific behaviour of COMMIT in an already-broken
> transaction yet again recently. So, I moved CF entry to the next CF,
> hope this will get eventually merged.
> LGTM

Pushed with minor emendations.

I'm not quite sure why we describe ABORT as quasi-deprecated but not
BEGIN; neither of them are in the standard.  I'm disinclined to touch
that state of affairs though.

            regards, tom lane