I am trying to keep my select statements compatible for running on
oracle or postgres. I ran into a problem with a query that is part of
a union. The original query clause is of the form:
select distinct f.id, '' from foo f;
I need the empty string as the second attribute because the first part
of the union has a second attribute. This works on oracle, but
postgres says:
ERROR: Unable to identify an ordering operator '<' for type 'unknown'
Use an explicit ordering operator or modify the query
If I get rid of 'distinct' postgres responds, but I don't get the
result I want. If I type
select distinct s.ben, cast ('' as varchar) from sitealertsview s;
I get the result I want, but it's not compatible with oracle.
Suggestions?
Thanks,
Sarah
smarie@ekno.com
____________________________________________________________________________
Lonely Planet's ekno - more than a phonecard
Get ekno before you go!
http://www.ekno.lonelyplanet.com