Re: Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random()
Дата
Msg-id 10246.1475016499@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random()  (Tom van Tilburg <tom.van.tilburg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom van Tilburg <tom.van.tilburg@gmail.com> writes:
> Good to know and I agree that it is not an urgent case.
> I think this practice might be more common in the POSTGIS community where
> there are plenty of set-returning-functions used in this way. My use was
> taking a random sample of a pointcloud distrubution.

Fix pushed to HEAD only.  Thanks for the report!

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LLVM Address Sanitizer (ASAN) and valgrind support
Следующее
От: Vitaly Burovoy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Detect supported SET parameters when pg_restore is run