SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL
От | Jeff Self |
---|---|
Тема | SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1024493212.11141.9.camel@jselfpc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to MySQL
Re: SQL performance issue with PostgreSQL compared to |
Список | pgsql-sql |
This popped up on a local mailing list and I was alarmed at what results the user was getting in regards to MySQL and PostgreSQL. It seems that the query he was running on both databases was much faster in MySQL than PostgreSQL. Here's what he wrote: ************************************************************************** I'll post this message to the list, in case anyone wants to follow - or, if it's too OT, let me know, and I'll stop. The query "SELECT authuser, SUM(bytes) AS traffic FROM logfile GROUP BY authuser ORDER BY traffic" on a DB of approx. 1.8 million rows (same data in Pgsql and in mysql) takes 1.83min. in mysql, and 7.36min. on pgsql. The mysql db is raw...no indexes or anything 'tuning' done. The pgsql db is indexed on the 'authuser' field, and I've run 'analyze logfile'. The machine is a PIII 600 w/728Mb RAM - and it's definitely CPU bound (both scream up to 100% and stay ;). As far as effecient queries, I'm not too sure how much more efficient that query can be made - I'm a netadmin, not a DBA :) ************************************************************************** My guess is he hasn't optimized PostgreSQL at all on his system. I will try and find out more from him as to what version of PostgreSQL he's running and try and get a copy of his postgresql.conf file. But can anyone think of how the SQL statement could be written to be more efficient? -- Jeff Self Information Technology Analyst Department of Personnel City of Newport News 2400 Washington Avenue Newport News, VA 23607 757-926-6930
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: