Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10240.1125633986@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> I found two different definitions of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE.
> Which is reasonable? Or do they have another meaning?
Hmm, I think those were both my fault at different times :-(.
Right now I am thinking that they are both not quite right,
in particular it ought to be
#define MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE ((BLCKSZ - 1) / (MAXALIGN(offsetof(HeapTupleHeaderData, t_bits)) + sizeof(ItemIdData)) +
1)
That is, the heaptuple space is padded to a MAXALIGN boundary, but the
itemid that points to it isn't. Comments?
(I believe that both modules want a ceiling definition not a floor
definition, ie round up any fraction. The -1 / +1 trick is of course
just one way to get that.)
Also, is this something that should be in a common header file? If so
which one? BLCKSZ, HeapTupleHeaderData, and ItemIdData are all defined
in different places ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: