Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> writes:
> Not only that, but from your description (I haven't read the patch,
> sorry), you'd be scanning the whole index multiple times (one per
> worker).
What about pointing each worker at a separate index? Obviously the
degree of concurrency during index cleanup is then limited by the
number of indexes, but that doesn't seem like a fatal problem.
regards, tom lane