Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1020882988.1596.8.camel@inspiron.cramers обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log entries? (Ron Snyder <snyder@roguewave.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Ron, Can you send the relevant java code as well Dave On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 22:08, Ron Snyder wrote: > Given the following log entries: > > May 7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [353] DEBUG: ProcessUtility: begin; > May 7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [354] DEBUG: query: SELECT COMPRESSED, > DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X' > May 7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [355] DEBUG: query: end > May 7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [356] DEBUG: ProcessUtility: end > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [357] DEBUG: query: begin; > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [358] DEBUG: ProcessUtility: begin; > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [359] DEBUG: query: SELECT COMPRESSED, > DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X' > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [360] DEBUG: query: end > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [361] DEBUG: ProcessUtility: end > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [362] ERROR: lo_close: invalid large obj > descriptor (0) > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [363] ERROR: lo_close: invalid large obj > descriptor (0) > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [364] ERROR: lo_close: invalid large obj > descriptor (0) > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [365] ERROR: lo_close: invalid large obj > descriptor (0) > May 7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [366] ERROR: lo_close: invalid large obj > descriptor (0) > > I'm trying to help some programmers figure out what portion of their java > code might be causing this, but I don't know java to help them debug their > code-- I was wondering if there is anything on the server end that I could > change to help them track this down. They're using the jdbc that was > current shortly after the 7.2 release and the 7.2 server (they're still in > acceptance testing for 7.2.1). > > They do turn autocommit off, and they've discovered that they may not have > been turning it back on explicitly so are going to make a change to that > portion of code. Are there any other easy mistakes that people have made > that may result in the above behavior? > > -ron > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: