Re: What popular, large commercial websites run
| От | Tom Jenkins |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What popular, large commercial websites run |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1020099938.19076.31.camel@asimov обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What popular, large commercial websites run PostgreSQL? (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 12:36, Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > That brings us to one of the best things about Postgresql - you can find > out easily if Postgresql isn't right for your job. You can easily test it > out for free, and if Postgresql doesn't do Feature X yet, or it's broken, > there's no marketing bullshit, half-truths or lies. The developers are > This is so very true. We didn't plan on using PostgreSQL for all our stuff but for the IAWG contract we didn't have a budget to buy an Oracle box for an offsite developer (me <grin>). So figuring we could switch to Oracle for production, I developed the backend server stuff against pg. Everything went so well and performance was acceptable that the client went thumbs up on using pg on production. -- Tom Jenkins Development InfoStructure http://www.devis.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: