Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1019989.1741363300@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 9:38 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> Also, benign typedef redefinitions are a C11 feature. In practice, all >> compilers currently in play support it, and the only problem you'll get >> is from the buildfarm members that are explicitly set up to warn about >> accidental C11 use. We could probably have a discussion about that, but >> for this patch set, it's probably better to just deal with the status quo. > Agreed. +1 for having a discussion at some point, though, because the > effect of the current rules seems to be that you have to write "struct > BananaSplit *" in a bunch of places instead of just 'BananaSplit *" to > avoid redefining the typedef. I'd be +1 if there's a way to allow that particular thing without thereby opening the floodgates to every other C11 feature. I expect not all of C11 is universal yet, so I think the buildfarm animals that are using -std=gnu99 are mostly doing us a service. But yeah, this particular thing is a pain in the rear. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: