Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, I'll bet the restore code doesn't realize that this can't run in
>> parallel with index creation on either table ...

> Yeah. Of course, it's never needed to bother with stuff like that till now.

> The very simple fix is probably to run a separate parallel cycle just 
> for FKs, after the index creation.

Um, FKs could conflict with each other too, so that by itself isn't
gonna fix anything.
        regards, tom lane